How Corporate Mergers Work: Deal Structures, Approvals, and Filings

A corporate merger works by combining two companies into one surviving legal entity that automatically inherits every asset, contract, debt, and lawsuit of the company that disappears. That transfer happens by operation of law the moment the merger takes effect, so no separate assignments or asset transfers are needed to move ownership. Getting to that moment, though, requires a sequence of board approvals, a shareholder vote, regulatory clearances, and a state filing, followed by months of tax and administrative cleanup on the other side.

What “Merger” Means Legally

In a merger, one corporation survives and the other ceases to exist. The surviving company steps into the shoes of both predecessors: it owns their assets, owes their debts, holds their contracts, and defends their pending lawsuits. Nothing gets left behind. That is the feature that distinguishes a merger from an asset purchase, where the buyer can pick and choose what it takes on.

Because the transfer is automatic, the structure the parties choose determines who ends up holding what. A poorly chosen structure can trigger tax consequences the parties did not intend, force renegotiation of key contracts, or drag the acquiring company’s balance sheet into liabilities it thought it was avoiding.1Duke Law Scholarship Repository. Unintended Consequences: State Merger Statutes and Nonassignable Licenses – Section: Forms of Merger

The Three Deal Structures

Most mergers use one of three structures, and the choice among them is driven by liability exposure and contract portability.

Direct Merger

The target merges straight into the acquirer. The target disappears and the acquirer survives, absorbing everything: assets, debts, contracts, litigation. It is the simplest structure and offers no liability buffer, so every obligation of the target lands on the acquirer at closing.1Duke Law Scholarship Repository. Unintended Consequences: State Merger Statutes and Nonassignable Licenses – Section: Forms of Merger

Forward Triangular Merger

The acquirer creates a new subsidiary, and the target merges into that subsidiary. The subsidiary, not the parent, takes on the target’s liabilities, which shields the parent while still giving it control of the operations and assets through its ownership of the subsidiary.1Duke Law Scholarship Repository. Unintended Consequences: State Merger Statutes and Nonassignable Licenses – Section: Forms of Merger

Reverse Triangular Merger

The acquirer’s subsidiary merges into the target, and the target survives as a subsidiary of the acquirer. Dealmakers often prefer this structure because the target keeps its legal existence, which preserves its contracts, licenses, and regulatory approvals. Many commercial agreements contain anti-assignment clauses that would fire if the contracting party ceased to exist; keeping the target alive avoids the problem.1Duke Law Scholarship Repository. Unintended Consequences: State Merger Statutes and Nonassignable Licenses – Section: Forms of Merger

Board Approval, Shareholder Vote, and Dissenters’ Rights

The core transactional document is the plan of merger. It names the surviving company, spells out how the disappearing company’s shares will be converted (into stock of the survivor, cash, or a mix), and lists any amendments to the survivor’s articles of incorporation.

Both boards must formally approve the plan by recorded resolutions. Shareholders then vote. Most states require approval by a majority of outstanding shares entitled to vote, and some companies’ charter documents set a higher bar, such as two-thirds for extraordinary transactions.

Shareholders who oppose the deal are not always stuck with its terms. Most states give them appraisal rights (sometimes called dissenters’ rights), which let a shareholder demand a court-determined fair value payment for their shares instead of accepting whatever the merger agreement offers. The procedures are strict and the deadlines short. Some states require a written objection before the vote, others a formal demand afterward, and nearly all bar a shareholder who voted in favor of the merger from later seeking appraisal. Missing a step forfeits the right entirely, so a shareholder who thinks the price is too low should consult the state statute and a securities attorney before the vote is held.

Due Diligence Before Signing

Due diligence is where the acquirer finds out what it is really buying. Financial statements are only the start. The investigation typically covers intellectual property ownership (patents, trademarks, copyrights, software licenses, domain names), pending and threatened litigation, environmental liabilities including Phase I and Phase II site assessments on owned or leased real property, regulatory permits and compliance history, and employee benefit plan obligations.

Environmental exposure deserves particular attention because contamination follows the property, not the former owner. If the target operated on polluted land, the surviving entity inherits the cleanup responsibility whether or not it caused the problem. The same principle carries over to pending employment discrimination claims and product liability lawsuits. Findings from diligence often reshape the price, the structure, or both.

Federal Antitrust Notification

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act requires both parties to notify the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice before closing a merger that clears certain value thresholds, so regulators can evaluate whether the deal would substantially reduce competition.2Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 15 U.S. Code 18a – Premerger Notification and Waiting Period

Not every merger triggers HSR. The rule applies only above a size-of-transaction threshold that the FTC adjusts annually, and some transactions also need to satisfy a size-of-person test based on party revenue or assets.3Federal Trade Commission. Steps for Determining Whether an HSR Filing Is Required Filing fees are tiered by deal value and also adjust each year, running from tens of thousands of dollars for smaller reportable deals to over $2 million for the largest.4Federal Trade Commission. Filing Fee Information

Once both parties file, a mandatory 30-day waiting period begins (15 days for cash tender offers). The deal cannot close during that window. If either agency spots competitive concerns, it can issue a Second Request for more documents and data, which extends the waiting period by another 30 days (10 days for cash tender offers) after both parties substantially comply. In practice, responding to a Second Request often takes months and costs millions in legal fees, because the agencies typically ask for enormous volumes of internal material.5Federal Register. Premerger Notification; Reporting and Waiting Period Requirements – Section: Executive Summary

Closing without filing a required HSR notification, or closing before the waiting period expires, carries civil penalties currently exceeding $53,000 per day, adjusted annually for inflation.2Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 15 U.S. Code 18a – Premerger Notification and Waiting Period

When a Foreign Buyer Is Involved

If the acquirer is foreign, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) may review the transaction for national security risks under section 721 of the Defense Production Act, with authority to block or unwind deals.6U.S. Department of the Treasury. CFIUS Laws and Guidance

Some cross-border deals require a mandatory declaration. Those include transactions where a foreign government holds a substantial interest in the acquirer and the target is a “TID U.S. business,” meaning one dealing in critical technologies, critical infrastructure, or sensitive personal data, and transactions involving companies that produce, design, or develop critical technologies subject to export license requirements. Mandatory declarations must be submitted at least 30 days before the expected closing date.7eCFR. 31 CFR 800.401 – Mandatory Declarations

Even when no declaration is mandatory, the parties can voluntarily notify CFIUS to obtain clearance. Skipping voluntary notification leaves the risk that CFIUS opens a review after closing and forces a divestiture, so most deal advisors recommend filing whenever a foreign buyer acquires a U.S. target in a sensitive industry.

SEC Registration for Public-Company Deals

When a merger involves publicly traded companies and the surviving entity will issue new securities to the target’s shareholders, the acquirer files a Form S-4 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The requirement covers mergers, exchange offers, and any transaction where state law would require a shareholder vote.8eCFR. 17 CFR 239.25 – Form S-4, for the Registration of Securities Issued in Mergers

The S-4 gives investors on both sides detailed information about each company’s finances, the expected effects of the merger, risk factors, and the terms of the share exchange. The SEC reviews the filing before the new securities can be issued, and proxy materials soliciting the shareholder vote are typically combined with it.

Tax Treatment

Whether shareholders of the target owe tax on the exchange of their stock depends on how the deal is structured. A merger that qualifies as a “reorganization” under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code lets target shareholders swap their shares without recognizing taxable gain at closing. That treatment is one of the main reasons companies choose stock-for-stock structures over cash.

Section 368(a)(1) recognizes several categories. A Type A reorganization is a statutory merger or consolidation under state law. A Type B is a stock acquisition using solely the acquirer’s voting stock in which the acquirer ends up with at least 80% control of the target. A Type C is an acquisition of substantially all of another corporation’s assets solely for voting stock. The “control” threshold under Section 368(c) means owning at least 80% of the total voting power and at least 80% of every other class of stock.9Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 26 U.S. Code 368 – Definitions Relating to Corporate Reorganizations

When a merger qualifies as a reorganization, Section 381 lets the surviving corporation inherit certain tax attributes from the disappearing entity, including net operating loss carryovers, capital loss carryovers, and various credits. The first-year use of inherited net operating losses is prorated based on how many days remain in the acquirer’s tax year after the merger date.10Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 26 U.S. Code 381 – Carryovers in Certain Corporate Acquisitions Section 382 adds annual caps on the use of acquired losses when there is a significant ownership change, so companies cannot buy loss-heavy businesses purely to harvest their tax attributes.

Where the merger is treated as an asset acquisition for tax purposes and involves goodwill or going concern value, both parties file IRS Form 8594 with their returns to allocate the purchase price across asset classes. The allocation determines each side’s basis and future depreciation deductions, and the form has to be refiled if either party later amends the allocation.11Internal Revenue Service. Instructions for Form 8594

Employment Consequences

Mergers create workforce exposure that is easy to underestimate. The surviving employer inherits obligations along with the people.

WARN Act Notice

The federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act requires employers with 100 or more full-time employees to give at least 60 calendar days’ written notice before a plant closing or a mass layoff. A plant closing is a shutdown of a facility or operating unit that costs 50 or more employees their jobs. A mass layoff is a cut of at least 50 employees where they make up at least a third of the workforce at that site, or a cut of 500 or more regardless of percentage.12Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 29 U.S. Code 2101 – Definitions13Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 29 USC 2102 – Notice Required Before Plant Closings and Mass Layoffs

In a merger, WARN responsibility shifts on the closing date. The seller owes notice for any qualifying event up to and including the sale date; after closing, the obligation belongs to the buyer. If neither side gives the required 60 days’ notice, affected employees can sue for back pay and benefits for each day of the violation period, up to 60 days.12Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 29 U.S. Code 2101 – Definitions

Successor Liability for Discrimination Claims

Courts in most jurisdictions treat the surviving company as potentially liable for the target’s unresolved employment discrimination claims. The analysis typically turns on whether the buyer had notice of the claims, whether the seller can still provide relief, and whether the buyer continued the same operations with substantially the same workforce. A buyer that keeps the same employees, supervisors, and location will almost always be treated as a successor employer.

Employee Benefit Plans

Merging two companies with separate retirement plans requires close compliance with ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. The core rule: every participant must be entitled, on a plan-termination basis immediately after the merger, to benefits at least equal to what they would have received immediately before. For defined contribution plans such as 401(k)s, each participant’s post-merger account balance must equal the sum of their prior account balances. Defined benefit plans require more elaborate calculations, and if the combined plan’s assets fall short of covering all accrued benefits, a special schedule of benefits has to be created to protect participants.14eCFR. 26 CFR 1.414(l)-1 – Mergers and Consolidations of Plans or Transfers of Plan Assets

Making It Effective: The State Filing

Once the boards and shareholders have approved the deal and every required regulatory clearance is in hand, the parties file articles of merger (sometimes called a certificate of merger) with the secretary of state in each state where the merging entities are incorporated. That filing is what makes the merger legally effective. Most states accept the filing through an online portal, and processing fees vary by jurisdiction.

The state reviews the filing for statutory compliance and issues a certificate of merger, which is conclusive evidence that the merger took effect on the stated date and that the surviving entity holds all rights of both predecessors. From that moment, the disappearing corporation ceases to exist as a matter of law, and no separate dissolution filing is required for it.

The surviving company then updates its registered agent records to reflect the new corporate status. Many states also require formal notice to known creditors of the disappearing entity, telling them the survivor has assumed all liabilities. Those notice periods give creditors a window to present claims before the post-merger administrative window closes.

After Closing: Administrative Cleanup

The state certificate sets off a chain of administrative work that can take months. Missing any of it can create compliance gaps, tax problems, or title issues on real property.

Employer Identification Number

The IRS handles the survivor’s EIN differently depending on the transaction. In a true statutory merger where one company absorbs another, the surviving entity keeps its existing EIN. A consolidation, where both original companies dissolve and a new entity emerges, requires a new EIN for that new company. The disappearing corporation’s EIN is retired and should not be reused.15Internal Revenue Service. IRS Determination on EINs in Reorganizations

Final Tax Returns

The disappearing corporation files a final federal income tax return (Form 1120 for a C corporation or Form 1120-S for an S corporation) for the short tax year ending on the merger date, checking the “final return” box. If the corporation adopted a formal plan to dissolve or liquidate any of its stock, it also files Form 966 within 30 days of adopting that resolution.16Internal Revenue Service. Closing a Business17Internal Revenue Service. Form 966 – Corporate Dissolution or Liquidation

Real Property Records

Although the merger transfers ownership of every asset by operation of law, real property records do not update themselves. The surviving company should record deeds or merger documents in every county where the disappearing entity owned real property. Skipping this step creates title chain issues that surface later when the survivor tries to sell, refinance, or lease. Recording rules and fees vary by county, and some jurisdictions require transfer tax filings even when the transfer arose from a merger rather than a sale.

Contracts, Insurance, and Licenses

Even a reverse triangular merger meant to preserve the target’s contracts does not eliminate the review work. The surviving company should read every material agreement for change-of-control provisions that may require consent or trigger termination rights. Insurance policies need endorsement to reflect the combined entity’s expanded operations and liabilities. Industry-specific licenses and permits may require notification to the issuing agency, and some will not transfer at all without a new application. Starting these reviews early is the best defense against a critical license or contract lapsing during the transition.